…interviewing pot sellers is unlike interviewing anyone else in business. And David Segal, " When capitalism meets cannabis", NYT, offers another perspective: But I expect that a search of student essays would turn up quite a few more. The other three seem to be isolated cases that might well be writers' or transcribers' slips of the finger. The most notable one is probably this passage in John Sladek's 1984 story "Answers", published in The Lunatics of Terra: A Google Books search turns up four instances. [Update - I note that refudiate has been invented before. That the tea party American, that movement, is racist. They could correct what this false accusation is They could refudiate what it is that this group is saying, and they could set the record straight It- it- False accusation, very unfortunate, and again very very unnecessary.Īnd his wife, you know the first lady spoke at NAACP so recently, In order to keep people away from not only the movementīut keeping them- keeping a wall built between what the message actually is Yeah, those over there on the left who are opposing that good message of tea-party Americans Well it's- it's very unfortunate that they're- they're taking this tacticīecause it's a false accusation that tea-party Americans are racist. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser. I found the screenshot of the deleted tweet on Charles Johnson's blog, Little Green Footballs, which has a useful review of the political controversy that prompted the second slip.Īnd here's the audio and transcript, in context, of last week's comment:Īudio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. But why didn't the first mistake get brought to her attention? This suggests that either her staff is not very efficient, or they're afraid to bring certain kinds of problems to her attention, or both. The use of refudiate in today's tweet was also noted by bloggers, and was then removed within half an hour or so, showing that someone in her entourage is on the ball. She was widely ridiculed for the error, at least in the blogosphere, and so you'd think that a functional staff would intervene to prevent future embarrassment. What's more serious, in my opinion, is that she didn't get set straight about the words in question by any of her advisors and friends, or for that matter by anyone at Fox. This is unimportant because politics is not a vocabulary contest. Palin had a blend of repudiate and refute as a well-established entry in her mental lexicon. The unimportant one is that the original example wasn't a slip of the tongue, but a symptom of the fact that Ms. The repetition means two things, one not very important, the other one more consequential. Back on July 14, when Sarah Palin used the blend refudiate in her role as Fox News contributor, I considered posting about it, but decided not to, since I'm not a fan of pouncing on political slips of the tongue.īut today, a week later, she used the same blend in a message on Twitter:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |