The perceived novelty and interest of recent claims that domestic politics matters can be understood only against the backdrop of Waltzian structural (or neo-) realism. Students of IR theory will recognize this as the central “reductionist” argument that Waltz attacks in his Theory of International Politics ( 1979). “Foreign politics”? But isn't that just the domestic politics of foreign countries, or the product of their domestic politics? One might reasonably ask what kind of politics there is besides domestic politics. ![]() Scholars of comparative politics sometimes wonder what would explain foreign policy if not domestic politics. Some of the noteworthy examples are Bueno de Mesquita & Lalman (1992) on interstate war Huth (1996) on territorial disputes Peterson (1996) on crisis bargaining Milner (1997), O'Halloran (1994), Verdier (1994) on trade policy Downs & Rocke (1995) on compliance and international cooperation Evans et al (1993) on “two-level games” Russett (1993) on democracy and war Snyder (1991) on great power expansionism Stamm (1996) on war outcomes Kier (1997), Legro (1995) on military doctrine and the contributors to Rosecrance & Stein (1993) on grand strategy. Many books on international relations published in recent years have also argued the case for the importance of domestic politics. Given that a significant number of articles were not about explaining foreign policy, 1this percentage is all the more impressive. For the years 1987–1996, slightly more than a third of the 193 abstracts I was able to code invoked domestic-political factors as independent or intervening variables. A crude measure of the prevalence of such claims, arguments, and evidence is the proportion of International Organization article abstracts that more or less explicitly invoke domestic politics or domestic-political factors in explanations for foreign policy choices. I also address the question of whether there is a sharp distinction between a “systemic theory of international politics” and a “theory of foreign policy,” arguing that there is an important and natural sense in which they are the same.Ī significant amount of recent research in the international relations (IR) field advances the proposition that domestic politics is typically a crucial part of the explanation for states' foreign policies. Implications of each approach are developed, and examples from the literature are provided. Or, if a systemic IR theory pictures states as unitary, rational actors and also requires that attributes of particular states not enter the explanation, then a domestic-political explanation is any one that involves state characteristics other than relative power. If a systemic IR theory pictures states as unitary, rational actors, then a domestic-political explanation is one in which domestic-political interactions in at least one state yield a suboptimal foreign policy relative to some normative standard. But these may be specified in several different ways-I spell out two-each of which implies a different concept of domestic-political explanations. What counts as a domestic-political explanation is defined by opposition to systemic or structural explanations. I argue that what constitutes a “domestic-political” explanation of a state's foreign policy choices has not been clearly elaborated. For Georgia Relay Access, dial 711.▪ AbstractA significant and growing literature on international relations (IR) argues that domestic politics is typically an important part of the explanation for states' foreign policies, and seeks to understand its influence more precisely. Ĭitizens in need of reasonable accommodations due to a disability including communications in an alternative format should contact Fulton WorkSource Disability Liaison, Kimyana Pippin at (404) 613-7035. For more information, contact WorkSource Fulton at 40, or visit Fulton County’s website at. With the support of WorkSource Georgia, services are provided through a network of One-Stop Centers statewide. Job seekers and employer customers can obtain a wide range of workforce-related tools and information needed to manage their work activities. WorkSource Fulton also helps Georgia move toward a comprehensive, customer-focused workforce investment system. The WorkSource Fulton WIOA team and Local Workforce Development Board supports a skilled and trained workforce and creates innovative programs that serve the changing needs of employers and the business community. The “Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)” Local Workforce Development Board (LWDB) will hold a board meeting on Thursday, Augat 9:30 A.M.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |